Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 17, 2011No. Docket: Aro-10-704PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] In this appeal we consider, again, application of the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule, M.R. Evid. 803(2), to a 9-1-1 call, in this instance when the 9-1-1 call followed a brief call to the victim’s ex-husband to remove her children from the threatening situation.

[¶ 2] John E. Taylor appeals from a judgment of conviction of one count each of burglary (Class B), 17-A M.R.S. § 401(1)(B)(4) (2010); domestic violence assault (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. §§ 207-A(1)(A), 1252(4-A) (2010); domestic violence criminal threatening (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. §§ 209-A(l)(A), 1252(4-A) (2010);…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. RabonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. State v. HaffordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. State v. RobertsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Bruce OuelletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  2. State v. CruthirdsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. State v. HollandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  4. State of Maine v. Dwain A. SykesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  5. State of Maine v. Timothy D. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API