Legal Opinion · Dissent

August Urbanek and Estate of Irene Urbanek, Deceased, August Urbanek, Personal Representative v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 6, 1984No. Appeal 83-1262Published

1DissentBennett, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the government may reallocate construction costs in accordance with the Welsh Homes formula (which the majority calls the “value method of allocation”).

I

The majority is laboring under the illusion that the main issue in this appeal is the apportionment of costs in accordance with “correct accounting practice” — a theory that no doubt will surprise the parties since no one argued it.1 The parties and the Claims Court believed that the issue here was whether the Welsh Homes formula should be applied to the peculiar facts of this case under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. American Automobile Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Commissioner v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. ByrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API