Legal Opinion

Chase v. Chase

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1983No. 6296PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Chief Justice.

The issue presented on appeal is whether military retirement benefits are divisible marital property upon dissolution of marriage.

James Henry and Marlene Greer Chase were married on August 13, 1955. One year prior to the marriage, James had entered the United States Air Force. He retired in 1974 and began to collect his military retirement pay.

Divorce proceedings were initiated in January 1980. A property settlement agreement was filed with the trial court and resolved all aspects of the Chases’ property, with the exception of James’s retirement pay. A subsequent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Cose v. CoseAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bullock v. BullockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re Marriage of GalloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Clauson v. ClausonAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API