Legal Opinion

Clemons v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1979No. 13211PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

A one-count misdemeanor information charged appellant with false pretenses. D.C.Code 1973, § 22-1301. A jury trial led to his conviction and to a suspended sentence and twenty-four months’ probation. 1 On appeal, appellant argues that there was a fatal variance between the original information and the offense proved at trial and, alternatively, that the government failed to prove an essential element of the offense of false pretenses. We affirm.

The facts in this case are essentially undisputed. Appellant was employed by W. & J. Sloane, Inc. for approximately two weeks. He was then terminated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hackney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Hall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Schwasta v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Douglas O. Gilmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  5. Salvatore J. Ciullo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. SINATRA v. SUTTON v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Sandwick v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. United States v. PowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Patterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API