Busta Ex Rel. Busta v. Columbus Hospital Corp.
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Erdmann
I concur in the majority’s opinion on Issues 1, 2, and 4, but write separately to dissent on Issue 3.
I disagree with the majority’s holding that the District Court’s failure to instruct on proximate cause was harmless error. I am convinced that the failure to define proximate cause for the jury was reversible error. In fact, the jury received no instructions at all which defined causation. Furthermore, I disagree with the majority’s analysis of foreseeability as applied to proximate cause and therefore dissent from the majority’s decision to overrule the requirement in Kitchen Krafters v.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McCain v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Calkins v. Cox EstatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Kitchen Krafters, Inc. v. Eastside BankMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Thayer v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Nelson v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.