Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Huggins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 23, 1972No. 5-6027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

The single issue on appeal is whether appellant railroad can, after order of entry and completion of work but before trial, dismiss its eminent domain proceeding and restrict its liability only to damages caused by its occupancy of the land.

Appellee’s land joined the railroad right-of-way. Located on the land was a large protruding rock which was thought to be in danger of falling over on the right-of-way. The railroad petitioned the chancery court to enter upon the land and remove the rock. Permission was denied and the court granted the landowner’s motion that the matter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Reynolds v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  3. Pine Bluff & Western Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. United States v. Yazoo & M. V. R.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Bryant v. Springhill Water & Sewer Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. City of Bryant v. Springhill Water & Sewer Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API