Legal Opinion

Rowold v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1994No. 02A05-9308-CR-277PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Today we decide two issues:

1. How must a trial court classify a federal felony conviction for habitual offender purposes?

2. If a trial court improperly sentences a defendant under the wrong habitual offender statute, how should the trial court correct its error?

Appellant-defendant Richard L. Rowold challenges his conviction and sentence for Criminal Recklessness, a Class D felony. 2 Rowold claims the trial court erred in refusing to give his tendered jury instruction and in enhancing his sentence by an additional ten years for being an habitual offender.

FACTS

On July 11, 1991,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baird v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Watkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Terrell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Cain v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Elmer Buchta Trucking, Inc. v. StanleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Tedlock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Steward v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Palmer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Darryl Calvin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API