Legal Opinion

Fidurski Et Ux. v. Hammill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1937No. Appeals, 234 and 249PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Appellants were owners of certain real estate which they orally promised to sell to John Munzek for $11,068. The parties went to the office of the building and loan association, which held a mortgage on the premises, to find the amount due on the mortgage. Appellee, secretary of the association, learning of the sale, orally agreed that in about three months he would pay $250 more for the property than Munzek was to pay for it. He induced appellants to persuade Munzek to release them, but failed to perform his contract. The association foreclosed the mortgage, purchasing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warren Balderston Co. v. Integrity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Klerlein v. WernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. McCreary v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Martachowski v. OrawitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon Bank, N.A., in No. 90-3712 v. First Union Real Estate Equity and Mortgage Investments, in No. 90-3790Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Bankers Trust Company v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API