Fidurski Et Ux. v. Hammill
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Appellants were owners of certain real estate which they orally promised to sell to John Munzek for $11,068. The parties went to the office of the building and loan association, which held a mortgage on the premises, to find the amount due on the mortgage. Appellee, secretary of the association, learning of the sale, orally agreed that in about three months he would pay $250 more for the property than Munzek was to pay for it. He induced appellants to persuade Munzek to release them, but failed to perform his contract. The association foreclosed the mortgage, purchasing the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Warren Balderston Co. v. Integrity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Klerlein v. WernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- McCreary v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Martachowski v. OrawitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon Bank, N.A., in No. 90-3712 v. First Union Real Estate Equity and Mortgage Investments, in No. 90-3790Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Bankers Trust Company v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.