Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marley v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 2000No. 49A02-9908-CR-617Published

1DissentBrook, Judge

I respectfully disagree with the majority’s resolution of Marley’s statutory construction claim, which I believe to be dis-positive of her appeal. Initially, I would observe that the Effects of Battery Insanity Statute, Indiana Code Section 35-41-3-11, is a particular species of the insanity defense 4 that applies only when a “defendant in a prosecution raises the issue that the defendant was at the time of the alleged crime suffering from the effects of battery as a result of the past course of conduct of the individual who is the victim of the alleged crime.” Ind.Code § 35^41-3 — 11(b)(1).…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burks v. BolerjackIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Sullivan v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Holmes v. ACandS, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Sullivan v. DayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Blackmon v. DuckworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API