Legal Opinion

Van Tuyll Fenn v. W. M. Ostrander, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order passing the receiver’s account and directing that the receiver’s fees and disbursements and the fees of his counsel be paid by the defendant corporation, Order modified.by reducing receiver’s fees to $800, and counsel fee to $800, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, (dissenting), McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham; J.

(dissenting):

The defendant W. M. Ostrander, Incorporated, appeals from so much of an order of the Special Term as directs the receiver’s compensation for his services, fees and disbursements and the fees of his counsel to be paid by the defendant corporation. The order appealed from passed ■ the receiver’s account; directed that the receiver be charged with the sum of $12,560:60.moneys received.by him as such receiver; finds the receiver has paid out the sum of $10,972.50, for which he. should be credited; that, out of the. balance of the moneys in his hands, after being, charged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fenn v. W. M. Ostrander, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brewster v. F. G. Brewster Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Fenn v. W. M. Ostrander, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API