Legal Opinion

Tabor & Northern Railway Co. v. Dyson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 14, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Mills District Court — Hon. H. E. Dbemer, Judge. Mandamus to compel the defendants as members of the board of supervisors to levy a tax. Judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGrander, J.

The incorporated town of Tabor originally embraced two half sections of land, lying contiguous, so as to form a plat one mile square. The town thus organized was in the county of Fremont, bordering on the line adjacent to Mills county. The following is a part of chapter 47 of Acts of the Sixteenth General Assembly:

“Section 1. That in addition to the methods now provided by law, any city in this state may have its limits enlarged in the manner herein prescribed.
“Section 2. The city council may fix the boundaries of the city as enlarged to the proposed extent, which boundaries shall, as far as…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Mount Carmel v. City of KingsportTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Village of Wakefield v. UtechtNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Creery v. Town of OkobojiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Portsmouth Savings Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Tabor & Northern Railway Co. v. McCormickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API