Legal Opinion

Cramer v. Lamb

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1931No. 6004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

This cause involved a rule for contempt against William E. Lamb, because of the alleged taking from the jurisdiction of the court of certain funds and for which the ancillary bill was filed in the ease of Schmitt, Receiver, v. Lamb (No. 6072) 48 F.(2d) 533, this day decided. Citation upon the rule was also quashed on the same ground as in that case, that is, because defendant, a resident of the state of Illinois, was present in the jurisdiction of the court as an attorney at law and therefore immune from such process.

Appellants have moved to dismiss the appeal upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schmitt v. LambCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dr. Joseph Gilbert v. Donald Johnson and Dr. Marc J. MusserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Heikkila v. BarberDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958
  3. Griffin v. County School Board Of Prince Edward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  4. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  5. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API