Legal Opinion
Medina v. Foundation Reserve Insurance
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 1994No. 20911PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
This appeal requires us to determine whether the district court properly dismissed a complaint pursuant to SCRA 1986, 1-037 (Repl.Pamp.1992) for failure to comply with rules of discovery. Plaintiff-Appellant Ricardo Medina sued Defendant-Appellee Foundation Reserve Insurance Company, Inc. (Foundation) for bad faith in refusing to honor an insurance claim. The district court found that Medina willfully provided false discovery responses and disobeyed a discovery order, and it therefore dismissed Medina’s action with leave to reinstate upon payment of sanctions and costs.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. FDC Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Sandoval v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Lopez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by23 opinions
- Amiker v. Drugs for Less, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Pierce v. Heritage Properties, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Gonzales v. New Mexico Department of HealthNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Lewis Ex Rel. Lewis v. SamsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.