Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 16, 2009No. 09 C 1543PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed suit against defendants Goldman, Sachs & Company (“Goldman”) and John M. Youngdahl (‘Youngdahl”), an employee of Goldman during the relevant time period (collectively, “defendants”), alleging that they violated the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (Count I). The complaint, premised on injury allegedly caused by defendants’ October 31, 2001 trading of 30-year bonds and bond futures, was not filed until March 11, 2009. Goldman argues that dismissal is appropriate because the complaint was filed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cancer Foundation, Inc. v. Cerberus Capital Management, LPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Hollander, Jacque v. Brown, JamesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. In Re Copper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Americanos v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. 520 South Michigan Ave. Associates, Ltd. v. ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Ploss v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Premium Plus Partners, L.P. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Richardson v. City of Chi.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Ploss v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API