Tomlinson v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed suit against defendants Goldman, Sachs & Company (“Goldman”) and John M. Youngdahl (‘Youngdahl”), an employee of Goldman during the relevant time period (collectively, “defendants”), alleging that they violated the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (Count I). The complaint, premised on injury allegedly caused by defendants’ October 31, 2001 trading of 30-year bonds and bond futures, was not filed until March 11, 2009. Goldman argues that dismissal is appropriate because the complaint was filed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cancer Foundation, Inc. v. Cerberus Capital Management, LPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Hollander, Jacque v. Brown, JamesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- In Re Copper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Americanos v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- 520 South Michigan Ave. Associates, Ltd. v. ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Ploss v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Premium Plus Partners, L.P. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Richardson v. City of Chi.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Ploss v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.