Legal Opinion

Knudsen v. Ereaux

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1996No. 95-422PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erdmann

Plaintiffs appeal from an order issued by the Seventeenth Judicial District Court, Phillips County, dismissing their amended petition for lack of standing. We affirm.

We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

1. Did the District Court err by failing to notify the parties that it was treating the motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment?

2. Did the District Court correctly determine that the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge a municipal annexation made pursuant to Title 7, Chapter 2, Part 46, Montana Code Annotated (1993)?

FACTS

This case has no adjudicated facts. It comes…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farris v. HutchinsonMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sharkey v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Health & Environmental Sciences v. City of LivingstonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hoveland v. PetajaMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Houston Lakeshore Tract Owners Against Annexation Inc. v. City of WhitefishMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Lohmeier v. Gallatin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API