Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Ruddle

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1990No. C-9422PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HIGHTOWER, Justice.

The issue which this court must decide is whether res judicata bars James Ruddle (Ruddle) from relitigating the division of his military retirement benefits. The trial court held that Judith Ann Baxter (Baxter), formerly Judith Ann Ruddle, was entitled to receive 37½% of Ruddle’s retirement benefits valued at the time of divorce. A divided court of appeals affirmed. 780 S.W.2d 888. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. 1

Baxter and Ruddle were divorced in 1978. At the time of the divorce, Ruddle had served twenty years in the military and was ranked as a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Browning v. PlackeTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wagner v. WarnaschTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Cook v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Segrest v. SegrestTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Pollard v. SteffensTexas Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reiss v. ReissTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Brandon v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Shanks v. TreadwayTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hagen v. HagenTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Fillingim v. FillingimTexas Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API