Legal Opinion

In re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust Executed by Lorraine Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1979No. 7814SC699PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

We hold the first deed of trust was properly subject to foreclosure for default of payments. The trial court entered findings of fact that no payments were received by the SBA from 19 January 1976 until 17 March 1976 when SBA notified the grantors and guarantors that the loans were in default and had been accelerated. The findings of fact by a trial judge are conclusive on appeal if there is competent evidence in the record to support them. Knutton v. Cofield, 273 N.C. 355, 160 S.E. 2d 29 (1968). There is ample evidence in the record to support the above findings of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Oliver v. . PinerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Lalanne v. LalanneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. In re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust of Michael Weinman AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API