Legal Opinion

Meadows Indemnity Co. v. Baccala & Shoop Insurance Services

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 29, 1991No. CV 89-4289PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

MISHLER, District Judge.

Defendants Insco Limited, Old Republic Insurance Company, Nutmeg Insurance Co., Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Hartford Casualty Insurance Co., Pacific Insurance Co., and Hartford Fire Insurance Co. (collectively the “Issuing Company defendants”) move to stay this action in favor of arbitration based on the arbitration clauses in their reinsurance contracts with plaintiff, Meadows Indemnity Company Limited (“Meadows”). Defendants Baccala & Shoop Insurance Services, G.L. Hodson and Sons, Inc., Corroon & Black of Illinois, Inc., Corroon &…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Europcar Italia, S.P.A. v. Maiellano Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Coors Brewing Co. v. Molson BreweriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Kuklachev v. GelfmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  5. Kittay v. Landegger (In Re Hagerstown Fiber Ltd. Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API