Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur Chappell

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 11, 2015No. 13-1748PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Chief Judge.

On September 15, 2010, a jury convicted Arthur James Chappell of sex trafficking an underage female in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591 based on his recruitment and prostitution of CB, a seventeen-year-old high school student. See United States v. Chappell, 665 F.3d 1012, 1013-14 (8th Cir.2012). Exercising our discretion on appeal to notice plain error in one of the jury instructions, see Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b), we “reverse[d] and remand[ed] for a new trial.” Chappell, 665 F.3d at 1015. On remand, the government secured an eleven-count superseding indictment, charging Chappell…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Randall RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Charles WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Reginald WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Dana Kidd, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. TempleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API