City of Pocatello v. Fargo
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
On appellants' application, a rehearing was granted, and they lay special stress upon the point that the $32,000 certificate of deposit was not covered by the bond, and the attorney for the estate of N.G. Franklin, deceased, particularly urged that this $32,000 constituted a trust fund, his conclusion being that no contract covering its safekeeping existed between the city and the bank, and therefore the sureties were not liable.
A careful study of the facts and law bearing thereon has convinced me that there is no justification for the conclusion of the majority on this rehearing. It is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Estate of Ramsay v. People ex rel. Southern Illinois PenitentiaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- State ex rel. Carroll v. Corning State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- State v. ThumIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.