Wilson v. Electric Power Board
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Justice.
This action for personal injuries was instituted by a lineman and by his wife for electrical burns which he sustained while undertaking to repair a transmission line. The line and a pole had been broken by a falling tree during an ice storm. The trial jury found in favor of the plaintiffs, petitioners here. The Court of Appeals reversed and dismissed, holding that the respondent Power Board was entitled to a directed verdict. It found no evidence of breach of duty by the respondent to the petitioner Wilson and also held that he was guilty of contributory negligence as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Shell Oil Company v. BlanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
- Pierce v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955
- Palenscar v. Michael J. Bobb, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bennett v. Trevecca Nazarene UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Patrick v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Brandon W. Martin and Amy Martin v. W. B. Melton and Peggy MeltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
- James Crain, et.al v. Baptist Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- June Patrick v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. City of Columbia, Acting Through the Board of Public Utilities, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980