Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sheppard v. Charles A. Smith Well Drilling & Water Systems

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 1983Published

1Concurrence

Yesawich, Jr., J. (concurring).

Were it not for the fact that the verdict is inadequate as a matter of law, I would, in accordance with our decision in Bodner v Steinhardt (71 AD2d 702), direct a new trial on the liability issue only.

Though pain and suffering are sparingly treated in the court’s charge, had that treatment been less than adequate, plaintiff’s experienced trial counsel would have voiced appropriate objection either at the trial, or in plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, or on appeal, thus, at least properly preserving this issue for appellate review (Caprara v Chrysler Corp., 52…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caprara v. Chrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Caprara v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Rush v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Bodner v. SteinhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API