Myrick v. Fruehauf Corp.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FORRESTER, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant Freightliner Corporation’s motion for summary judgment on grounds that plaintiffs’ state law claims are preempted by federal law. Both parties have requested oral argument. However, because there are no disputed facts and disposition of defendant’s motion turns purely on legal grounds, the request for oral argument will be DENIED.
I. FACTS
The following facts are undisputed. On February 6, 1989 a truck operated by Mun-son Transportation, Inc., collided with a vehicle being driven by plaintiff, Ben Myr-ick, on U.S.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995