Legal Opinion

McAnarney v. Caughenaur

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Pawnee District Court. Action by Caughenaur against McAnarney, to recover damages for an assault and battery. Trial by tbe court, at the December Term, 1883, and judgment for the plaintiff for $1,000 and costs. New trial denied. The defendant brings the case here. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

"Valentine, J.:

This was a civil action for an assault and battery, commenced by William Caughenaur in the district court of Pawnee county against James McAnarney, who resided in Bice county; and the only question presented to this court is whether the action was commenced in the proper county, or not. The plaintiff claims that it was, but the defendant claims that it was not. The question whether the action was brought in the proper county, or not, was presented to the *622court below upon an agreed statement of facts, the material portions of which read…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Underwood v. FoshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. City of Kansas City v. SessionsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Bearman v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Clark v. WillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API