Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Eddie Orcutt v. Charles Chambliss

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided January 16, 2018No. 2016–CA–00902–COAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

GRIFFIS, P.J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:

¶ 38. Here, the majority affirms a judgment that concludes a parcel of property is ownerless and awards a monetary judgment against no one. I find that there are fundamental errors in the chancellor's judgment that require we reverse and remand this case for a new trial. I therefore respectfully dissent from the decision to affirm the chancellor's judgment. I do however concur, although for different reasons, with the majority's decision to reverse and remand the chancellor's final judgment on the award of statutory damages.

I.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sass Muni-V, LLC v. DeSoto County, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Lawrence v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2004
  3. Jones v. GraphiaCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
  4. Ladner v. Stone CountyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2006
  5. Rebuild America, Inc. v. Estate of WrightCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API