Martens v. Bethel
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJack Stakislaw, J.
This action is one to impress a trust upon eight accounts in the names of the individual defendants held in three separate New York banks. Plaintiff Martens now moves for summary judgment.
Martens’ claim that the funds in question were formerly contained in nine different accounts in three Florida banks is not contradicted. These had been held jointly by plaintiff and his wife, now deceased. The defendants, the children of the deceased wife, also do not dispute the assertion that their mother withdrew the moneys in the Florida joint accounts and that these withdrawals actually constitute the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Hagerty v. HagertySupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Winters v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Chase Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Overseas Development Bank in Liquidation v. NothmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Estate of MeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
- In re the Estate of DuysburghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1992