Legal Opinion
United States v. Waldroop
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 19, 2005No. 04-6308PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Garland Lee Waldroop II, having been convicted of bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud, appeals his convictions on the basis of insufficient evidence. He also argues that his sentence was imper-missibly enhanced based on judge-found facts in violation of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and that, when enhancing his sentence based on the amount of losses he caused, the district court should have taken into account his civil settlement with the bank he defrauded. None of these arguments is availing. We exercise…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Gonzalez-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. DazeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WardellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Henry, WalterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.