In re Bladen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Cross-appeals by the petitioner, John T. Bladen, as committee, etc., and by the Brooklyn Trust Company, as committee, etc., from an order of the County Court of Kings county, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 29th day of September, 1914, confirming the report of a referee herein judicially adjusting and determining an account of the committee of the person of Samuel E. Haslett, an incompetent, and fixing the compensation of the committee with an award…
Read the full summary
Cross-appeals by the petitioner, John T. Bladen, as committee, etc., and by the Brooklyn Trust Company, as committee, etc., from an order of the County Court of Kings county, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 29th day of September, 1914, confirming the report of a referee herein judicially adjusting and determining an account of the committee of the person of Samuel E. Haslett, an incompetent, and fixing the compensation of the committee with an award of costs and allowances. The petitioner, Bladen, appeals from all of said order except in so far as it judicially…
1Opinion of the Court
Putnam, J.:
The committee of the person of Mr. Haslett, an incompetent, presented to the County Court an intermediate account, covering the period'of twenty months — March 18, 1912, to November 18, 1913. The Brooklyn Trust Company and Mr. John T. Bladen had been appointed committee of the property of the incompetent, and Mr. Bladen, with Mrs. Ellen Haslett Samuel, committee of the incompetent’s person. The Code of Civil Procedure (§ 2322) expressly declares that the committee of the person and the committee of the property “may be the same individual, or different individuals, in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Diaper v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1862