Legal Opinion

United States v. Mendez-Santana

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 20, 2011No. 09-2073PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.

Lorenzo Mendez-Santana entered an unconditional guilty plea to the charge of illegal reentry after previous deportation following an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(2) & (b)(2). At the conclusion of the plea hearing, the district judge stated he would review the presentence report before deciding whether to accept the guilty plea. Before sentencing, Mendez-Santana filed a two-part motion including both a request to withdraw his guilty plea and a request to dismiss the indictment as barred by the statute of limitations. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. Keith PickettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. CombsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Antonio Garcia-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Dominick AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Branden BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API