Vadell Johnson v. State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, J.,
for the Court:
¶1. The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment “protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal.” 1 It also “protects the accused from attempts to relitigate the facts underlying a prior acquittal.” 2 In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Vadell Johnson invoked this latter protection. He argued he could not be prosecuted for possession of a weapon by a convicted felon without relitigating the same facts of his earlier misdemeanor stalking convictions.
¶ 2. But missing from Johnson’s argument is a “prior acquittal,” in which the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Charles L. Kuebler v. Victor Mason, Hinds County SheriffMississippi Supreme Court · 2019