Legal Opinion

McKernan v. Doniger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, lis pendens canceled and judgment granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff and defendant Doniger are partners. The partnership owns real property in Rochester. Doniger, who has a majority interest in the partnership, executed a purchase and sale contract with a third party on behalf of the partnership. Plaintiff maintains that the proposed sale is prohibited by the partnership agreement. Plaintiff brought an action seeking a declaration of his rights under the partnership agreement and filed a notice of pendency (lis…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Home Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. General Property Corp. v. DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Interior Design Force Inc. v. DorfmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Alternate Energy Management Corp. v. FontanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freidus v. SardelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Felske v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Liffiton v. DiBlasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API