Legal Opinion

Borman v. Baker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1897No. Nos. 10,564—(119)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the intervenor, L. Schneider, from a judgment entered in the district court for Winona county, pursuant to the findings of Gould, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to restrain defendant Wendelborn from further proceeding with a foreclosure by advertise-' ment of a mortgage upon certain real property, which may be called the “factory site,” which mortgage, it was alleged, had been improperly and without authority executed and delivered by defendants Baker, Clement, and Leicht, as trustees, to one Scott, and by him assigned to Wendelborn. The further object of the action was to obtain an accounting with the trustees. One Schneider intervened, and alone appeals from the judgment. The only question is whether the conclusions…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hovelsrud v. HovelsrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API