Legal Opinion

Lopez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 30, 1988No. 01-87-01017-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice

(Assigned).

A municipal court jury in Houston, Texas, convicted appellant of “operating an adult arcade without a permit” and assessed a fine of $750. On appeal to a Harris County Criminal Court at Law, his conviction was affirmed. We affirm.

In his first three points of error, appellant contends that Houston Municipal Ordinance No. 85-1337 violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Specifically, he argues that the ordinance is overbroad, “void for vagueness,” and that it “violates due process of law” and constitutes an impermissible…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. PughTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Standard v. SadlerTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Casias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Tullos v. Eaton Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. City of Wichita Falls v. AbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Fain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Fain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. James White v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  5. Roger Eugene Fain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API