Legal Opinion

In re Ginsberg

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided September 15, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Proceeding to compel an accounting by the assignee in the assignment of Morris Ginsberg.

1Opinion of the CourtPbyor, J.

On the removal of an assignee for the benefit of ■creditors, a substitute was appointed, and to this successor the assignee was directed to deliver the fund in his possession, and ■enjoined from otherwise disposing of it. The order provided also that the deposed assignee should account. Meanwhile, however, In several suits by different creditors, in the superior court, judgments had been entered vacating the assignment as fraudulent and void, appointing a receiver of all the assigned property, and requiring the assignee to turn it over to him, and naming a referee to audit the accounts of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James L. v. CarrylSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Schuehle v. . ReimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Williams v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Hammond v. Hudson River Iron & Machine Co.New York Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re General Assignment of Henry Thoesen & Bro.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. In re the General Assignment of BostwickNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API