Legal Opinion
Koehm v. Kuhn
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 9, 1989No. 6620PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendants, Ida Kuhn and Anthony Caltabiano,1 appeal the judgment rendered for the plaintiff, Lorraine S. Koehm, in an action for damages and release of mortgage brought pursuant to General Statutes § 49-8 (c). The plaintiff has cross appealed.
The defendants claim that the trial court erred (1) in finding that the amount due in satisfaction of the debt was delivered to the defendant, (2) in finding that the plaintiffs met the notice requirements of General Statutes § 49-8 (c),2 (3) in finding that the restrictive endorsement placed on the check by the plaintiff effected an accord and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Faith Center, Inc. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Koehm v. KuhnConnecticut Superior Court · 1987
- Scripture v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
- Cantor v. Department of Income MaintenanceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fromer v. Boyer-Napert PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Palmieri v. Smith, No. Cv94 0533684 (Jul. 18, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Ames Department Stores, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Four Beaches Condo v. W.C. Brescia Plumb., No. Cv96-0384124 (May 23, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Spakowski v. Charter Oak Walk-In Medical Ctr., No. 52 81 37 (Jun. 2, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.