Legal Opinion
National Air Traffic Controllers Ass'n v. Federal Service Impasses Panel
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 23, 2008No. Civil Action 08-481 (RMC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
The National Air Traffic Controllers Association (“NATCA”) seeks to force the Federal Service Impasses Panel (“Panel”) to assist them in resolving bargaining impasses with the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). Like a similar suit the NATCA brought before this Court in 2004, the NATCA asserts that the Panel improperly declined to exercise jurisdiction to resolve these impasses. This Court held previously, and now finds again, that the Federal Labor Relations Authority (“FLRA”) is the appropriate forum to determine whether the Panel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Air Traffic Controllers Ass'n v. Federal Service Impasses PanelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Gonzalez Terrazas v. Del Records Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Navarro v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025