Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 20, 1944No. 4-7357Published

1DissentMcFaddin, J.

My dissent herein is because I believe that the majority is giving the act involved (§ 4991, Pope’s Digest) a liberal construction instead of a strict construction. I will attempt to clarify and elucidate my statement.

I. The Act is a Legislative Grant, and is to be Strictly Construed.

The appellee claims the free right to have its wires attached to the bridge (about 1600 feet long) now being erected by the State Highway Commission, over, or leading to, the Arkansas River between the cities of Van Burén and Ft. Smith. The appellee will thus be using free the bridge built by the state, and will…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. WattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  3. Warner v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bullington v. LoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Priest v. CapitainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API