Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Buerman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 1, 1999No. Nos. 98-2391, 98-2867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

We deny appellee’s motion for rehearing. We are writing only to address the response filed by appellate counsel for the appellants, who regularly appear in this court. This response appears to be identical to the responses filed by these counsel to all motions for rehearing in their cases. The response, notwithstanding that it is four pages in length and cites a number of cases, makes only one point, which is that the motion for rehearing violates Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a), which provides that motions for rehearing “shall not re-argue the merits of…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. STATE, DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY v. HaskinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API