Legal Opinion
Ramos v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided February 26, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00235Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION RAYNALDO RAMOS PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-235-DPJ-ASH HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY DEFENDANTS COMPANY, ET AL. ORDER This case is before the Court on Plaintiff Raynaldo Ramos’s Motion to Compel, which also seeks leave to exceed the number of depositions provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Case-Management Order [15]. Mot. [140]. As explained below, Ramos’s motion is granted in part but otherwise denied. I. Facts and Procedural History Ramos suffered serious physical injuries in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- David Thompson v. Bank of America N.A., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Ross v. Citifinancial, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.