Legal Opinion

Dirr v. Adler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1933No. Docket No. 97, Calendar No. 36,928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is a suit for rescission. Plaintiff had decree. Plaintiff owned a 12-family apartment in Detroit, which she had purchased for $100,000 in 1919 and afterward mortgaged for $60,000, of which $54,500 remains unpaid. She paid the mortgage instalments until October, 1931, when she was able to pay only the interest. There was talk of foreclosure and plaintiff wanted to sell the property. She answered an advertisement of defendants, who were in the business of dealing in real estate, and, after some negotiations which she claims began with her offer to sell for $10,000 and defendants say…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schupp v. Davey Tree Expert Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Baas v. ZinkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Becker v. Illinois Life Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Meade v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. American Trust Co. v. CasselmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jessica Ohst v. Matthew J CrehanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API