Legal Opinion

Polk v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 10, 1992No. A91A1809PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Arnold Shulman.

Appellant James Carl Polk was convicted of aggravated assault based on evidence that he shot an acquaintance, Phillip Gammage, in the head with a pistol. The appellant testified at trial that Gammage was advancing on him with a knife at the time and that he fired in self-defense. He brings this appeal from the denial of his motion for new trial.

1. The appellant enumerates as error the admission of testimony by the arresting officer that, in response to on-the-scene questioning, the appellant admitting having shot the victim. The appellant objected to this testimony on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Whitley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. Christopher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Syfrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. Barge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Barker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Wakefield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API