Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Justice.
The plaintiffs, sole survivors of William S. Norton, seek in this suit to recover for the direct losses suffered by them in the alleged wrongful death of their father. In a prior suit the same plaintiffs had asserted their claims for damages under the transmitted rights of their deceased parent.
In the first suit, when called upon to do so, plaintiffs refused to amend their pleadings so as to include in their demand their claims for direct losses; and the case was tried solely on plaintiffs’ demand for recovery on their transmitted claims, resulting in a judgment in their favor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Succession of WhitnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Exchange Nat. Bank v. Holoman Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
3Cited by11 opinions
- Quarles v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Nick Rollins and Burtreas McGowan Rollins v. Ralph D. Dwyer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Maher v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974
- Mix v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.