Legal Opinion

United States v. John Paul Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1982No. 81-1117PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAST, District Judge:

THE APPEAL

Wilson, appearing pro se, and in forma pauperis, appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for escape under 18 U.S.C. § 751(a).1 We note jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

THE FACTS

On December 17, 1979, Wilson pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor counterfeit charge, 18 U.S.C. § 491(a). He received a one year sentence with six months suspended on the condition that he spend six months in a treatment-oriented institution, and was placed on three years probation.

After some delay due to another pending proceedings, Wilson was taken to the West…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Larry A. Storseth, 623435 v. John D. SpellmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan Manuel Bautista, United States of America v. Javier Cabrera-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Scarbrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. State v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API