Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dille v. Knox Lumber/Division of Southwest Forest

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 1990No. C4-89-1423Published

1DissentYetka, Justice

I would reverse both the compensation judge and the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals because I believe that the findings are manifestly contrary to the evidence. At the outset, it is important to point out that, in order to be entitled to compensation, the employee does not need to show that the October 1983 lifting incident was the sole cause of her disability, only that it was a substantial contributing cause of her disability. Roman v. Minneapolis Street Ry. Co., 268 Minn. 367, 380, 129 N.W.2d 550, 558 (1964). I submit that the facts are uncontradicted that the employee was injured…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Roman v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Nord v. City of CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Klapperich v. Agape Halfway House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Tolzmann v. McCombs-Knutson AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API