Legal Opinion

Arce v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 20, 2008No. 4D08-198PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

974 So.2d 591 (2008)

Jose M. ARCE, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D08-198.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 20, 2008.

Jose M. Arce, Chipley, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

2Per curiam

Upon our review of the most recent order denying Jose M. Arce's rule 3.800(a) motion, we reverse and remand with directions that Arce be resentenced without habitual offender designation. Within his initial motion Arce alleged that one of the predicate offenses used to support his habitual offender sentence was not his offense. Arce v. State, 946 So.2d 645 (Fla. 4th DCA…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. WISENBAUGH v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Arce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. WISENBAUGH v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API