Legal Opinion

CORCORAN v. COMMISSIONER

United States Tax Court

Decided January 18, 2002No. 2947-01UnpublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARK CHRISTOPHER AND NANCY LOUISE CORCORAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

CORCORAN v. COMMISSIONER

No. 2947-01

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2002-18; 2002 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 18;

January 18, 2002, Filed

Respondent's determinations sustained. Petitioners required to pay $ 2,000 penalty to United States under section 6673(a).

Mark Christopher Corcoran, pro se.

Timothy F.Salel, for respondent.

Wolfe, Norman H.

WOLFE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WOLFE, Special Trial Judge : Respondent determined a deficiency of $ 4,155 in petitioners' 1998 Federal income tax. In the answer to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  2. Greenberg's Express, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  3. Glenn Crain v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Norman E. Coleman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Gary Holder v. Secretary of the Treasury and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Pietanza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cabirac v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  2. Takaba v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  3. Loofbourrow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  4. Facq v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  5. Hawkins v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API