Legal Opinion
Grey v. City of Norwalk Board of Education
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 4, 2004No. 3:00CV2033 (JCH)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 38]
HALL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Patricia Grey asserts claims of unlawful discrimination based on Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.) the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. § 46a-60(a)(l) (“CFEPA”), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and common law negligent infliction of emotional distress. Defendants City of Norwalk Board of Education (“Board”), Superintendent Victor Herbert, and now-former Deputy Superintendent Greg Riccio (hereinafter referred to as “defendants”) move for summary judgment. For the following reasons,…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dall v. St. Catherine of Siena Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Murray v. Town of North HempsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Greene v. Brentwood Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Fotopolous v. Board of Fire Commissioners of the Hicksville Fire DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Weisbecker v. Sayville Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.