Legal Opinion
Jones v. Maples
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Saxe, J.
The order of the IAS Court authorizing plaintiff pro se, Chuck Jones, to conduct a videotaped deposition of defendant Marla Maples, albeit with the protection presumably provided by the presence of a Judicial Hearing Officer (JHO), must be reversed. In these truly unique circumstances, permitting Jones to proceed with a videotaped deposition of Maples is a frightening prospect, and constitutes an improvident exercise of discretion.
Chuck Jones alleges that in 1987 he was retained by Marla Maples as a combination personal manager, press agent, accountant, tax adviser…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barouh Eaton Allen Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Jones v. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Liebman & Charme v. LanzoniCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995
- Roche v. UdellNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- Troutman v. WashburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tannenbaum v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Affinity Elmwood Gateway Properties LLC v. AJC Properties LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Jones v. MaplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Parker v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 2003
- M.P. v. Jewish Bd. of Family & Children's Servs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.