People v. Planavsky
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1302Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
I. Introduction
Back in the early Sixties the Legislature enacted section 3051 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Under the statute, “if it appears” to a sentencing judge that the defendant is a narcotics addict, or in danger of becoming one, the judge must stop everything and hold a hearing on the possibility of civil commitment to the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC).
What happens, however, when a possibly addicted criminal defendant makes no request for civil commitment and there is no record made of any consideration of the idea by the trial judge? Must the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. M.S.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. EllisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. LizarragaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. PlanavskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.