Legal Opinion

State v. Gostevskyh

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 24, 2013No. 10C40028; A146637PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for fourth-degree assault and contempt, asserting two assignments of error: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting, as substantive evidence, the victim’s hearsay statements to the investigating deputy sheriff, and (2) that the court erred in entering a misdemeanor conviction for contempt, based on defendant’s violation of his pretrial release agreement, because contempt is not a crime. We reject defendant’s first assignment of error without discussion. With regard to the second, the state concedes that the trial court plainly erred in entering…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. QuadeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PoitraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API